Online proofing and review for regulated content

Review and approve the real production file, with every decision captured as it happens. Built for teams that have to satisfy a regulator, not just a brand guide.

Book a demo

Trusted by leading companies across regulated industries

Regulated review is a different problem
In regulated work, approval is not just about whether the content looks right.

It is whether the right people reviewed it, in the right order, against the right version, with a record that can stand up to a regulator, auditor, or state examiner.

Most proofing and workflow tools were built for creative review. They help people comment, compare, and approve. But regulated content asks a harder question: can you prove how the decision was made?

That is where the process usually breaks down. Approvals move into email. Sign-offs live in someone's memory. The version that shipped is not always the version that was reviewed. And when a market conduct exam or CMS filing review arrives, the team loses days rebuilding a decision trail that should have existed from the beginning.

Aproove is built for that second question, from the file up.

Pixelated gradient background transitioning from blue at the bottom left to green at the top right.
Gradient background transitioning from pink in the upper left corner to yellow in the lower right corner with a pixelated texture.
Gradient background transitioning from green at the top to yellow at the bottom with a subtle pixelated texture.

The file, understood down to the component

When a file is uploaded to Aproove, we do more than display it. We rip it apart and understand what is inside: the text, layers, versions, changes, brand data, and structure underneath.

The payoff is immediate when legal or compliance enters the process. Instead of receiving an entire document to read from end to end, they are pointed to the specific content most likely to need their attention.

That matters because regulated review depends on precision.

Specialty tools for regulated formats

Regulated work rarely arrives as a clean PDF.

It can be packaging with dielines and spot colors. Direct mail with postal marks. Video with on-screen disclosures. Technical drawings. Multi-state insurance kits. The review tools have to match the work.

Aproove renders files through genuine Adobe and Microsoft libraries, so color is press-faithful, not approximated. That matters when the risk is small but material: a changed disclosure, an altered barcode, a missing postal mark, or a claim that shifted between versions.

A review interface anyone can use

The hardest reviewer to onboard is often the person who reviews only a few times a year.

A compliance officer, outside counsel, product expert, or executive should not need training just to leave a comment or make a decision.

Aproove gives every stakeholder a simple review experience built around the actions they actually need: mark up the content, comment in context, mention the right person, and see what changed.

No training, by design.

Secure file handling and collaboration

Sensitive content should not have to leave a secure environment just to be reviewed.

Aproove processes the file once and streams it to every reviewer. The asset can be seen, reviewed, and approved without being downloaded.

Access is controlled in layers, with the right people seeing the right content at the right time. And because Aproove is built for concurrent review at scale, security does not slow the process down when hundreds or thousands of reviewers need to be involved.

Decisions that are documented and auditable

A proofing tool captures comments. Aproove captures decisions.

In a decision-based workflow, the route a piece takes is shaped by the choices made along the way. Each individual and team decision is recorded as it happens, in a real-time audit trail that stays with the work.

Versioning is automatic, so no one reviews a stale proof by accident.

AI that briefs the reviewer

Aproove AI Agents work inside the proof, not beside it.

Because Aproove already understands the file at the component level, an agent can read the content before a human does. It can flag areas of risk, classify what it finds, apply tags, route work, and leave notes in context for the reviewer who follows.

The agent suggests. The human decides.

That distinction matters in regulated work. AI can reduce the burden of routine review, but accountability still belongs with the people who approve the content.

A single pane of glass for all teams

Regulated content is never owned by one team.

Legal, compliance, brand, marketing, product, agencies, and outside partners all touch the work, often at the same time.

Aproove gives them one controlled place to work. Tasks show each person what needs their attention. Discussions stay attached to the content. A colleague, reviewer, or outside guest can be pulled into the process securely, with the right level of access.

The conversation stays with the work instead of scattering across inboxes.

What changes

1

The review no longer starts from zero each round.

2

Reviewers enter with context. They work on the real file. They are directed to what matters. Decisions are recorded as they are made, so the approval trail becomes a byproduct of the work, not a project after the fact.

3

Rounds compress. Risk becomes easier to see. And when a regulator or auditor asks how a piece was approved, the answer is already documented.

No more reconstruction.
No more fog.

See Aproove on your own process.

Book a demo
Abstract blurred gradient background blending green, blue, and yellow colors.